NOD32: "Accept NO substitutes" fellas...
For the BEST in speed & throughput of operations (because it's largely MOSTLY written in PURE Win32 Assembler language, with a F A S T engine/algorithm), AND, for the BEST in HEURISTICS (best-guess based upon analysis type tech, "smells like duck, looks like a duck, sounds like a duck - MUST BE A DUCK" type of work) - the TRUE MARK OF EXCELLENCE in an antivirus product... imo, @ least.
I say that, simply because HEURISTICS excellence is indicative of being able to find, what NOBODY ELSE CAN, & can turn up "previously unknown threats" for analysis via submission to the AntiVirus OEM themselves (which many do, via their "quarantine" features etc. et al).
Not knocking NAV Corporate 10.2, my former fav (since it is FAR lighter on resources than the Norton 360 client package etc. & other variants from NAV, but, using the essentially SAME scanning engines etc. as the others no less... just lighter, & FASTER)... OR, AVG + AntiVir (other 2 I have tried over time, both decent, BUT, AVG does give you email protection in its FREEBIE model, whereas last time I tried it? Avira AntiVir (I used it before AVIRA bought it out) does not, last I knew @ least).
I just have found that the folks from ESET here:
http://www.eset.com/...competition.php
(data from VB100, a noted tester of antivirus products IN COMPETITION)
&
the folks @ av-comparatives (latest test data from NOV. 2007):
http://www.av-compar...sse_2007_11.php
Generally tend to NOT make a liar out of me... despite my BOLD statements above (because it is TOUGH to determine an "all-around best" in anything, imo!)
* Last time I looked? NOD32 excelled on BOTH tests for speed, accuracy, & especially in HEURISTICS (missing NONE ever, afaik, on unknown or NEW virus')...
APK