You couldn't take screenshots of DVDs that were playing without specialized software, also a DRM tool demanded by the MPAA.
Fact of the matter is the DRM in Vista is in place because Microsoft chose to play ball with the MPAA, RIAA and SPA
ahead of time and avoid potential litigation. It's not some grand ploy by Microsoft to make you get only the hardware they choose, it's early compliance, for better or for worse, with the big brother associations who are smacking around every type of digital format they can in the misguided hopes of controlling digital media.
Microsoft is getting a horrendously bad rap over this but it's the MPAA, RIAA and SPA who should be getting the bad rap. They are the ones demanding super stringent adherence to DRM. They are the ones trying to remove Fair Use from Copyright Law. They are the ones demanding software and hardware manufacturers "get on board" or be faced with costly litigation (ie. targeting users has failed, targeting mass distributors online has failed so now they'll try to control the form of access to media, namely our computers, software and digital devices).
Right now I guarantee the MPAA, RIAA and SPA are glad Microsoft is taking the heat for this because it lets them avoid customer awareness. If you think DRM in Vista is bad, just give it a couple of years and your cable/satellite digital tuner boxes, digital televisions, advanced digital cell phones, and next generation digital playback devices (bluray, hd-dvd, DVRs) will ALL be forced to comply with the RIAA/MPAA/SPA's DRM standards.
Just imagine a day when you try to record your favorite program on your DVR, but have to get a license to do so, per program, and then you can only play back that item on a specific digital television for a specific period of time as per the license you had to get. That day isn't too far off if the MPAA and RIAA get their way, and with the significant amount of legal and political clout they hold, getting their way isn't very farfetched.
This post has been edited by Warnie P.: 01 March 2007 - 05:56 PM